Filed under: Uncategorized
Just read a post from a guy I went to college with that asks the question “Should Our Churches be Racially Segregated?” – Very thought provoking question. You can read the original post here.
This was my response to Adam’s post…
I think that culturally diverse is the way the church should be…I am all for “Your will be done on earth as it is in heaven.” – Something tells me Heaven will be more like New York City than many cities down in the south : )
I honestly think the issue comes down to style and culture. We would like to think it comes down to the unifying gospel of Jesus…but folks are attracted to style. Music is huge which I’m not sure if that is good or bad. Most churches in America that are supposedly “integrated” are charismatic churches with a blended music style. Also there is the style of preaching (loud and declarative, calm and conversational, “reverent” and liturgical) – i think it is a simple as the lunch table at high school…people like their own culture.
I think that either a house church model that didn’t rely as heavily on certain types of worship might work…maybe even going without music and “worshipping” some other way that wasn’t as style specific. I also think a lot of practical relationship building outside of the church walls would be great by individual believers. Not relying on church small groups for community…but rather intentionally having your own diverse community that is not as easily divided by denomination or cultural music styles.
What are your thoughts?
4 Comments so far
Leave a comment
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

What about Desmond Anderson? Did he and dad sing ebony and ivory whilst staring into one another’s eyes, or was that just a horrid nightmare? Seriously though, because of the sometimes insurmountable discrepancies in worship, I think the best way to start is for white churches and black churches to form sister church relationships that don’t initially focus on joint services. Mens’ breakfasts, service projects, and a good ol’ church picnic are all easier times to facilitate community.
Comment by Josh LeRoy August 18, 2008 @ 6:18 pmJosh, I like your idea.
Dustin, I agree that the cause of division is cultural style and preference – which I think includes: music style, preaching style, mode of dress, language (talking like a “white person” or in some other American dialect), and culture of the church. Examples: gospel music vs. the rockish Hillsong stuff, preaching loud and yelling and declaring vs soft conversational vs funny vs serious, dress: dressing-up nice or wearing shorts and flip flops.
I’m white, and I’m culturally white as well. I’m not comfortable in the black church setting, not because I hate it, it’s just a totally different culture for me, I don’t like the music or preaching style, or mode of dress, or the “church culture” (assumptions, beliefs, etc).
Catalyst Wild Goose Chase: clue 7 – Ben’s Blog.
Comment by jessephillips August 19, 2008 @ 8:18 amAwesome conversation starter!
For me the thing to remember is that sometimes it’s about me and sometimes it’s not. Sometimes I’m with the body to get fed and sometimes I am with the body to feed the hungry & broken.
So, to follow the lunch table idea. Sometimes we get a comfortable lunch with our friends full of laughter and community and sometimes the Holy Spirit calls us out of our comfort zone to go sit with the outcasts or be brave and speak to the popular table. Actually, maybe the analogy isn’t so far off. I am finding more and more that for me, “body life” has less to do with what happens inside the walls of a church and more to do with who I break bread with…
Comment by betsy canas garmon August 19, 2008 @ 12:03 pmIsn’t the Church simply the relational body of Christ? We can spend a lot of time, energy & focus trying to create diversity & unity, but I’m not sure it is that important. I think God expects us to be the Body of Christ where we are. Sometimes that lends itself to cultural diversity and sometimes it doesn’t. As long as our representation of Christ (both individually & corporately) isn’t a skewed/incorrect picture of who He is we’re okay. My two cents.
Comment by Chris Ediger August 19, 2008 @ 6:28 pm